Fintech Incident Response Audit Program
Six weeks of structured practice for security, compliance, and product leads who must defend how their firm detects, contains, and explains incidents across payment and lending surfaces.
Learning outcomes
- Produce a detection-to-containment timeline that cites primary evidence.
- Score playbook gaps against a fintech-specific control checklist.
- Assemble an audit binder section for customer and partner notice decisions.
- Facilitate a tabletop that leaves artifacts suitable for external review.
- Explain residual risk without inventing false certainty.
What you work through
Module 1 — Scope the money path
Draw the rails your fictional firm touches, then mark where logs actually exist versus where teams assume they do.
Module 2 — Detection honesty
Turn alert noise into a chronology. Practice writing the first credible “we knew” timestamp.
Module 3 — Containment trade-offs
Document freezes, merchant holds, and API throttles with the business impact spelled out.
Module 4 — Notice craft
Draft notices for cardholders, merchants, and lending clients; peer-review tone and precision.
Module 5 — Binder assembly
Package evidence, decisions, and open questions into a reviewable audit section.
Module 6 — External walkthrough
Present to a simulated diligence panel and revise based on pointed follow-ups.
Led by practitioners who grade binders, not vibes
Haeun Park
Former payments risk lead and independent IR audit facilitator based in Seoul. Haeun has walked merchant acquirers and lending startups through partner diligence after real incidents, and designs the grading rubrics used in this program.
Tuition reference
No checkout on this site. Figures below help teams budget. Confirm availability via contact.
Individual seat
₩1,890,000 / learner
- Live sessions and recordings
- Two binder critiques
- Alumni template pack
Team triad
₩4,950,000 / up to 3
- Shared company scenario
- Facilitated internal debrief
- Priority office hours
Audit Briefing add-on
₩620,000 / session
- Half-day leadership walkthrough
- Gap list for your stack
- Optional after the cohort
Clear answers, including a real limit
Who is this for?
Security engineers, compliance leads, fraud ops managers, and product owners at fintech firms who share ownership of incident narratives.
Do you cover Korea-specific partner reviews?
Yes—sessions include examples of diligence questions common in Seoul partner onboarding and post-incident follow-ups. We do not provide legal advice.
What is a genuine limitation of this program?
We do not run your production incident for you, and we cannot certify that your firm will pass a named regulator review. Graduates leave with practiced methods and graded artifacts; outcomes still depend on your stack maturity and staffing during a real event.
Is there a refund policy?
See our Refund page for eligibility and timelines.
Reviews tied to this course
“Module 3’s containment trade-off worksheet exposed that our API freeze runbook never named who could authorize merchant payout holds. Awkward, useful.”
Sora K. · platform security · Busan
★★★★☆
“Solid binder critique. I wanted more time on crypto on-ramp logs; the payments examples were stronger.”